Zencargo Market Update: 25th February 2026
Scroll to find out more
Scroll to find out more
The US Supreme Court struck down several of President Trump’s expansive global tariffs, ruling that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not provide the authority to implement them. The decision does not affect all of Trump’s tariffs, leaving in place those imposed under separate statutes, such as the steel and aluminium measures under Section 232. However, it upends the country-by-country “reciprocal” tariffs, which range from 34% for China to a 10% baseline for the rest of the world.
Following the court’s decision, President Trump signed an executive order imposing a fresh 10% global flat-rate tariff, with the possibility of a 15% tariff for some countries mooted on Wednesday. The new rate was applied under Section 122(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, intended to address ‘balance of payments’ deficits in international trade, rather than the issue of trade deficits, which were the stated justification for the original tariffs.
These new tariffs have a limit of 150 days, after which they will need to be approved by an act of Congress. In the meantime, they may well see legal challenges from affected businesses contesting the grounds on which they have been applied.
Other tariffs that remain rely on other legal foundations, including Section 232, which allows regulation based on national security concerns and includes tariffs on steel and aluminium imports. Some countries – notably China – are still subject to tariffs under section 301, which allows duties to combat unfair trade practices. Any new tariffs imposed under Section 301 would first require a formal investigation.
The new policy raises the effective rate for countries that had previously agreed their own deals, including the UK, the EU, and Japan. In response, the European Union has officially put its framework trade agreement with the US on hold, though the UK has said their own deal will remain. For countries such as China and Brazil, the new 15% baseline is lower than the tariffs they had previously faced.
Already, some US companies are looking to sue the Federal government to reclaim duties paid under the old regime. Senate Democrats have proposed legislation to mandate full refunds with interest, following estimates from Penn-Wharton that over $175 billion in tariff revenue may now be refundable.
Central China (SHA/NGB)
North China (DLC/TSN/TAO/PEK)
South China (CAN/SZX/XMN)
Central China (SHA/NGB)
North China (DLC/TSN/TAO/PEK)
South China (CAN/SZX/XMN)
Antwerp
Rotterdam
Europe Public Holidays
We anticipate a shortage of availability and the occurrence of delays around the bank holiday periods. Plan ahead and allow extra time for your products to be delivered.
24.02.2026
25.02.2026
26.02.2026
27.02.2026
28.02.2026
The information that is available in the Zencargo Market Update comes from a variety of online sources, partners and our own teams. Click below to learn more about how Zencargo can help make your supply chain your competitive advantage.
Last updated: Thursday 5th March 2026
In Focus: Europe congestion hits post-pandemic peak Severe winter weather syste...
Less-than-Container Load (LCL) shipping is the practice of combining cargo from...